Grace Hsieh
Grace Hsieh
Grace is a visual and user experience designer interested in exploring the intersection of design, community development, and environmental sustainability. Bringing together skills such as data analysis and visualization, human-centered design, and communications strategy in accelerating innovation.
 

Vaccination Decision journey

A learning card game to explore the varied decision-makings in terms of vaccinating kids to open up the dialog

fEB - MAY 2015

Client

x

role

Design Researcher, Game Designer

deliveries

Synthesized insights, Game, and Workshop

 

The problem

Once irradiated diseases are slowly on the rise both here in the US and in developing countries. In both developed and developing countries, parents are hesitant to vaccinate their children. Our mission is to undercover the roots of the issue, focusing locally (NYC), and facilitate the conversation.

Over the last 5 years, vaccine-preventable outbreaks have been increasing around the globe. Although it's a complex problem, health officials say one key culprit is that more and more people are choosing not to get their kids vaccinated against these diseases. Substandard vaccination rates create an opening for outbreaks, which often start when an unvaccinated person catches the disease while traveling abroad and spreads the illness to friends and family upon returning

Vaccine-Preventable Outbreaks

2008

2008

2013, Source: Council on Foreign Relations

2013, Source: Council on Foreign Relations

MY ROLE

Design Research, Game Design, Graphic Design

  • I involved the entire design process from interviewing to brainstorming the interventions, then led the materials design stage to build the game for the workshop facilitation.

Teams

  • Team lead: Caroline McAndrews

  • Designer: Grace Hsieh

  • Designer: Nazli Cangonul

  • Researcher: Tana Abbar 

 

Research

Goals

In order to identify the roots of why parents are hesitant to vaccinate their children, we want to target parents (and soon-to-be parents) who are in the midst of making the decision to vaccinate or not.  Where does their information come from?  Who do they trust the most to help them make the decision? And ultimately, how do they decide?

To that end, we'd like to learn:

  • How to parents decide whether to vaccinate their children?

  • Where do they get their information?

  • What are the reasons that stop someone from vaccinating his/her child

Site and participant sample

Potential Sites/Sources for Participants: 

  • Playgrounds on a weekend

  • Friends, family, professional networks

  • Vaccine Education Center for referrals to mothers

Participant Sample: 

  • Recent parents (0-2 year olds), or pregnant soon-to-be mothers

  • Targets: 8 in-context interviews/call-in subjects/network diagrams, 10-15 intercepts/network diagrams

tHE Approach

  • Intercepts at park

  • In-context interview (Network Diagram/ Call-ins)

Insights are 30% data, 30% perspiration, 30% inspiration, 10 % determination, and the rest is luck.
— Megan Fath
Interception

Interception

lEARNING INSIGHT highlights/

 How do parents decide whether or not to vaccinate their children?

/ WHEN

  •  A doctor is irrelevant to the decision making of vaccination

    We initially thought that a parent’s relationship with his or her pediatrician would influence decision-making in some way. What we found out is that the decision to vaccinate or not vaccinate a child happens long before a parent has a child

  • The decision to not to vaccinate occurs as a result of prior experience with vaccinations that makes a doctor’s opinion irrelevant

    Whether deciding to vaccinate or not vaccinate their children, our interviewees spoke of experiences that occurred long before they became pregnant

“I chose not to vaccinate my children. I knew that before they were born...my sister got 20 vaccines [for overseas study] in the course of two months and it literally almost killed her.”

  • Research reinforces that decision
    Once the decision is made, research that contradicts the decision is disregarded

“I base my decisions on facts, not opinions like everyone else” 

  • Non-vaccinators seem to be better informed than vaccinators

    None of our interviewees who vaccinated their children could name the different types of vaccines their children were receiving, nor what the order was. However, even though non-vaccinators shared various reasons they resisted using vaccines, all of them are contradicted by the CDC.

“Most vaccinations, you don’t end up being inoculated. They’re actually putting the virus into your body. If you have a compromised immune system, that can affect you for years later. It is essentially putting poison in your body.”

/ WHY

  • The decision about vaccination is related to parent's point of view about responsibility (community vs. self/child)

  • Fear of the effects of the vaccine outweigh feelings of safety it instill in vaccinators.

  • Vaccinators fear non-vanninators in the way that non-vaccinators fear the vaccine. 

    / HOW

  •  The ability to limit and control the number of people around their kids affects a mother's decision about vaccinating their child

    • A. Non-vaccinators speak of rewards that outweigh the risks.

    • B. (Power of control) Non-vaccinators can always vaccinate "later" if there is a threat (validating)

 
IMG_3743+copy.jpg
 

Game design and workshop facilitation

Design Goals

  1. Understanding why parents do/ do not vaccinate their kids

  2. Acknowledging the sources for information and decision making process, and evaluate parents’ trust level on them.

  3. Finding grass roots to disrupt/intervene this process

 

Final outcome

A FACILITATION WORKSHOP TO ASSIST PARTICIPANTS TO EMPATHIZE WITH MOTHER'S DECISION AND IGNITE DEEP CONVERSATION . 

WORKSHOP GOAL

  • Share our insights.

  • Participants understand when, how, and why parents decide whether or not to vaccinate their children.

  • Participants leave with an understanding of where they might intervene if they wanted to solve this issue.

30 mins session with a mixed group of five female and one male

agenda

  1. Walk and look (3 mins) - We set up an environment to argument participants’ understanding of the topics and the target group’s stories. Using mood boards, baby book,  Images, quotes, interests, activities and beliefs of interviewees that humanize them as loving, thoughtful mothers

  2. Intro/ Card Game - Facts (7mins)

  3. Timeline - Cards(Quotes) (8mins) -
    Following that game, we will ask participants to align the same cards to a road map this time and help them understand which facts might have happened in which time period of the interviewees.

    Afterwards, we will show them how insights aligned the map that we made, and ask them compare the results. This is also a way to break their misconceptions about vaccination decisions, following with a debrief.

  4. Stories (Fear)  (10mins)

  5. Last insight, Close (2mins)

 Feedback

The general feedback we got was agreed that it’s a great tool to help build up the empathy and understanding to both sides of parents’ decision making. Instead of disagreeing either side of the decision, the flow inspired them to brainstorm how to intervene and build support in their journey.